One thing I’ve noticed over the previous decade of writing about hedge funds is that they are all very completely different. Whereas some sections of the monetary media appear to love to assault hedge funds for being nothing greater than closet indexers with excessive charges, that is removed from the reality.

A big part of the business does fall into this bracket (and the identical is true with actively managed mutual funds and exchange-traded funds), however there’s numerous funds that haven’t solely overwhelmed the market over the long run, however outperformed it considerably.

Distinguishing energetic funds

The primary level any investor has to ask when deciding on an energetic fund –and that is the case with hedge funds, mutual funds and ETFs — is that if they perceive the technique.

Like shares, funds shouldn’t be purchased with out understanding what makes them work and what the managers’ fashion is. Understanding how the fund works is simply as necessary as understanding how a enterprise works. This is applicable to buyers and fund managers throughout the spectrum, from giant personal workplaces to endowments and retail buyers. The funds one owns ought to match into one’s funding technique.

This brings me to my foremost level. There isn’t any proper or fallacious solution to run a hedge fund or energetic fund. Some funds selected solely to personal just a few holdings within the portfolio and nonetheless obtain superior outcomes. Others can personal a well-diversified portfolio.

Totally different funds, completely different kinds

Two funds I’ve written about lately had been Nick Sleep’s Nomad and Chase Coleman (Trades, Portfolio)’s Tiger World Administration.

Nomad returned 20.8% each year return earlier than charges between September 2001 and December 2013. On a web foundation, the fund returned 18.4%, in comparison with an annualized return of 6.5% for the agency’s benchmark, the MSCI World. Sleep achieved this efficiency with greater than 90% of Nomad’s belongings invested in three shares.

However, Tiger World’s flagship long-short fairness fund has compounded buyers’ capital at 21% each year after charges for the previous 20 years. On the finish of 2020, the portfolio contained 100 completely different equities on the lengthy facet, based on the agency’s 13F report.

Norbert Lou’s Punch Card Capital portfolio not often has greater than six holdings. Between June 2004 and Sept. 30, 2011, he outperformed the S&P 500 by 12.3% annualized. In the meantime, TCI Fund Administration has returned round 18% each year web of charges. There are presently 13 holdings within the portfolio.

Top-of-the-line-performing hedge funds of all time, which normally flies beneath the radar, is Kynikos Capital, run by Jim Chanos (Trades, Portfolio).

By the tip of 2017, Kynikos Capital Companions achieved a web annualized acquire of 28.6% since its launch in October 1985. How did he do it? Based on stories, Chanos has blended leverage with passive funds and selective shorting.

The purpose is, there are a lot of methods to run a fund and some ways to earn a excessive return. Traders ought to select a technique that works for them and that they perceive. It doesn’t make any sense to repeat a technique simply because it has been proven to outperform.

One other factor to notice is that each sort of technique may have winners and losers. Nomad owned three foremost shares, which labored for that fund. Even Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) has not often held a portfolio that concentrated. It labored for Nomad, however has most certainly not labored for a lot of different fund managers and particular person buyers.

The very fact is, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all resolution to managing a portfolio. Some methods will work higher for some buyers than others.

It is all about discovering a stability that works. There isn’t any sense following a technique one feels uncomfortable with as a result of that is more likely to lead the errors.

Learn extra right here:

Not a Premium Member of GuruFocus? Join a free 7-day trial right here.

Concerning the writer: